Musk’s Twitter endgame may be a lower purchase price

Elon Musk has agreed to pay Twitter $44 billion, which is way more than it’s worth. His actions indicate that he does not want to pay that much – he still wants the company, but not at this price. So the big question in the markets is: Will he end up buying the company, and if so, how much will he ultimately pay?

why does it matter: At stake is the future of one of the world’s most important social networks.

  • And on a purely financial level, Twitter contributors have a direct interest in how much they will eventually receive. Moreover, Tesla shareholders have an indirect but similarly significant financial interest in what is happening.

The Big Picture: Musk is contractually obligated to buy Twitter at the agreed-upon price, and he can certainly do so.

  • Focus a lot of attention on The $1 billion termination fee in the short-form merger agreement. Fewer people have looked at the section on “determined performance” in the long-running merger plan that basically states: “If you try to undo this, we can take you to court in Delaware, and the court will force you to buy the company at the agreed price.” .

Between the lines: This language is especially relevant in such cases, where the buyer has the ability to pay in full. (Even if he has to sell a large chunk of Tesla stock to get the cash he needs.)

  • The main prefix is IBP Inc. against Tyson Foods Inc, With Don Tyson of Tyson Foods playing Elon Musk. He tried to back out of an agreed-upon acquisition of the IBP, but in 2001 a Delaware court forced Chancery to buy the company anyway.

What’s Next: Musk and Twitter, in particular, will not want a protracted court battle. Twitter may agree to a small discount to the agreed price, just to get the deal done.

  • After LVMH tried to back off its purchase of Tiffany at the start of the pandemic, for example, that deal ended up with a 2.5% discount off the originally agreed price. A similar discount in this case would bring Twitter’s price down to $52.80 per share, from $54.20.
  • Alternatively, Musk could pay Twitter a large fee to be relieved of its obligation to buy the company. When Apollo backed out of its purchase of Huntsman in 2008, for example, it paid a $1 billion settlement — much larger than the $325 million breakup fee in the merger agreement.

Bottom line: “The separation fee is not an option to give up,” says Mitu Gulati, professor of law at the University of Virginia. “Specific performance promises are very doable. Especially in Delaware.”

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: